Minimum, Necessary and Sufficient Care
by David W. Stephen, Ph.D.
When caring for elders, how do we decide what care is right? What guidelines can we follow to be confident that we are providing just enough care to meet thier needs, and not so much care that we take away the independece that they could retain?
My best friend, Marc Ringel, is a family doctor who practices in the small town of Brush, Colorado. Last month, we took a men-only vacation together with his two college-age boys, a three day raft and camping trip that gave us a lot of hammock time.
“When I started out as a physician, I wanted to cure everybody. Now that I’ve aged and many of my patients have entered their golden years, I am much more concerned with helping them – and myself - maintain the health they do have and cope with the problems I’ve given up trying to cure,” Marc said as we sat in the shade at the cove by our camp on the open river. It was the kind of place where trees seem to act out whatever has happened to them, the kind of place where you might expect to see trouble just walking away.*
We talked about elder care and aging with grace, about the loss of independence that comes with getting old and having to rely on others, about how hospitals and nursing homes and medical staff can rob an elder of dignity by taking away their choices about where they live, when they eat and bathe, what they do for entertainment, whom they converse with, and what kind of medical and personal care they receive.
Together, we pooled an interesting mix of professional experience and formal training that included philosophy, theology, business, medicine and medical ethics, education, motivational psychology, sociology, and Fine Arts. By the end of our trip, we had cobbled together some guidelines about eldercare, gleaned from all these disciplines, from our own experience, and from our own personal consciences.
We made this proclamation: Eldercare decisions should be based on allowing the elder to retain independence, dignity and security. Further, we determined that three words could help determine how to accomplish these ideals. The words are minimum, necessary and sufficient.
These three words, minimum, necessary and sufficient, represent a concept of the Montessori school of education. That concept applies to how much positive reinforcement – praise – a student should receive for doing something right. The last two words, necessary and sufficient, are pretty much self explanatory, but it takes a little understanding of motivational psychology to understand why the minimum amount of reinforcement is best. Reinforcing a behavior that is already in place is actually DE-motivating.
Here’s a story to illustrate why this can occur. A writer lived in an apartment building and his study had windows that opened onto the alley below. Every afternoon at four, a group of three boys would stop in the alley on the way home from school and make a terrible racket beating trash cans with sticks. This disturbed the writer at a time when his creative juices were flowing at their daily peak, so one day he called down to the boys and asked them to come around to the front of the building. He invited them into his apartment and showed them how his windows were directly above the place where they performed their daily tattoos loudly on the trash cans.
“I always look forward to your noise,” he told the boys. “Thanks. It gives me a welcome break and helps me take my mind off my work for a while. Here’s five bucks for each of you. If you promise to come by again tomorrow and do the same act, I’ll give you money again tomorrow.”
The boys thought the guy was nuts, but next day they came and performed enthusiastically, making even more noise than usual. Then they reported to the writer’s door to collect. “Good job, men!” praised the writer. “It was the noisiest and best yet,” and he gave them each a dollar. “Be sure to come back again tomorrow,” he said. Somewhat puzzled, the boys left, grumbling. The next day, same thing, but this time he gave them each only a quarter. “You’re a freak,” the boys proclaimed, “and a cheap freak, to boot. You think we’re going to do that for just a quarter? Get outta here...” ...and they never returned.
This shows that providing more reward than what is necessary and sufficient can backfire. So, let’s apply these three words to the goal of preserving and promoting independence, dignity, and security.
MINIMUM – Sometimes, less is more. Allow the elder to do as much as he or she can do, and provide only the minimum amount of assistance. Strive to be patient, tactful and compassionate as you encourage the client to be independent. For example, it may take an hour to help an elder get dressed, if you allow him or her to do most of the tasks independently. You could be more “efficient” and dress the senior yourself in a few minutes, but time is less important than independence. There are many ways to serve an elder’s needs and not rob them of independence. When you provide the minimum amount of care, you promote independence. Our first goal is to help the elder retain independence.
NECESSARY – Always honor the elder’s wishes. Use good judgment to determine what kind of care is necessary. Too often, elders are robbed of their dignity when someone else decides what is “necessary” or “right” for them. The senior may need your help to perform activities of daily living, but that does not mean that they want you to make decisions for them. For example, the senior may not want to exercise, or eat, or cooperate in following his or her care plan. But if the elder makes most of the choices in crafting his or her individual care plan, and if the elder’s goals are clear, then the elder will be more cooperative and it will be easier for you to determine what is necessary. Always offer the senior a choice. Self determination – allowing the elder to make choices – is the key to living with dignity. When you let the elder decide what is necessary, you promote dignity. Our second goal is to help the elder retain dignity.
SUFFICIENT – You are obligated to provide sufficient care to keep the elder safe and secure. First, do nothing that might harm the senior; second, remedy any unsafe condition as much as you can and as soon as you can; third, report any accident, incident or safety issue to someone who can help. But the elder should not only be in a safe environment, the elder should also feel safe and secure. The senior needs to feel that he or she can depend on you for support. Emotional security is as important as physical safety. When the elder knows that you reliably and willingly provide sufficient care, you promote emotional and physical security. Our third goal is to help the elder retain security.
To paraphrase 1 Corinthians:13, “Abide these three: independence, dignity, and security... and do so by providing the minimum, necessary and sufficient loving care.”